Risk stratification soon after acute infarction.

نویسندگان

  • F J Wackers
  • B L Zaret
چکیده

Two decades ago, exercise testing “soon after acute myocardial infarction” meant that stress testing was performed 3 weeks after the acute event.1 It was conventional wisdom that patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction should avoid physical activities exceeding a workload of 3 METs for some time.2 Formal physical rehabilitation was not commenced before 10 weeks after infarction. In 1979, Theroux et al3 challenged this concept by submitting patients with recent and uncomplicated acute infarction to submaximal exercise electrocardiography at the time of hospital discharge, which at that time was '11 days after infarction. Not only was submaximal exercise testing shown to be safe in such patients, it also provided important prognostic information concerning the occurrence of future cardiac events. Although this landmark study set the stage for the use of exercise testing to evaluate patients with recent myocardial infarction, the prognostic power of exercise electrocardiography in later studies was found to be limited.4 This was probably due to difficulties in interpreting exercise ECGs in patients with abnormal resting ST-T segments. A few years later, Gibson et al5 showed that the addition of Tl myocardial perfusion imaging to submaximal predischarge exercise electrocardiography significantly enhanced the power of the test for predicting future cardiac events compared with that of exercise electrocardiography alone. More recently, Mahmarian et al6,7 demonstrated that quantitative single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging with either exercise or pharmacological vasodilation in patients with recent myocardial infarction allowed patients to be stratified into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk groups. Cardiac events after infarction have been noted to occur predominantly during the 4 to 6 weeks after the acute event, after which time the cardiac event rate is considerably lower.8 Thus, risk stratification by stress testing should be performed before the patient is discharged from the hospital. When exercise testing is postponed until several weeks after infarction to achieve maximal exercise effort, there is substantial risk that some patients will already have suffered the cardiac events about which one wished to prognosticate. The 1996 “Guidelines for Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction” recommend submaximal exercise testing at 4 to 6 days after infarction and symptom-limited exercise at 10 to 14 days after infarction.9

منابع مشابه

[Risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome].

BACKGROUND The spectrum of symptoms of patients with active ischemic heart disease ranges from silent ischemia to acute myocardial infarction and the extent of myocardial damage from reversible myocardial injury to extensive necrosis. The term "acute coronary syndrome" comprises this continuum. In particular the evaluation of patients without ST-segment elevation is difficult, for clinical symp...

متن کامل

Prognostic Impact of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Index on Hospitalization Mortality of Patient with Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Introduction: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the deadly cardiovascular diseases. One of the indexes proposed in these patients for risk stratification is the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk index (TRI), which includes three parameters of systolic blood pressure, age, and heart rate. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of TRI on in-hospit...

متن کامل

Importance of Exercise Capacity

The measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) plays a key role in many strategies for managing patients after acute myocardial infarction. We tested the hypothesis that exercise capacity 1 month after myocardial infarction provides additional information in patients with a low LVEF and therefore assists in risk stratification. One hundred fifteen patients, with documented myocard...

متن کامل

Clinical Application of Heart Rate Variability after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Heart rate (HR) variability has been extensively studied in patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The majority of studies have shown that patients with reduced or abnormal HR variability/turbulence have an increased risk of mortality within few years after an AMI. Various measures of HR dynamics, such as time-domain, spectral, and non-linear measures of HR variability, as wel...

متن کامل

Variation on a theme: CMR as the "one-stop shop" for risk stratification after infarction?

Predicting prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains clinically challenging, partly due to significant interpatient variability in risk profiles and what is often individualized therapeutic management. In addition, the risk of poor outcomes varies as a function of time from AMI, particularly in the period spanning initial hospital presentation to the time of discharge. Systemati...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

متن کامل
عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation

دوره 100 20  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999